In 1993 Congress enacted a law, the Family Preservation and
Support Services Act, which allows states to receive an infusion of dollars to develop or
expand services to children and families. These services are intended to support families
who, for the reasons of poverty, isolation, or lack of parenting experience, may require
extra help in raising their children. These services are also intended to preserve
families who may already have displayed problems resulting in abuse or neglect and who
need extra assistance in maintaining their children safely at home.
The purpose of the portrait is to assist Louisiana parishes in
continuing to plan at the local level for new and expanded services. Another purpose of
the portraits is to help provide a more coordinated approach to supporting families. The
hope of the Louisiana Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services, in
issuing this updated portrait is that each parish will use the information to stimulate
growth in services for children and families based on the data about needs across the
state.
The Parish Portrait contains information relevant to family and
child well-being in Louisiana and is divided into several sections. The first section,
entitled "Summary Measures", provides a general overview on how parishes rank on
broad well-being indicators. In the sections that follow, textual and graphical
information is provided on parish-specific data. The following sections are included:
Overview, Local Economic Conditions, Child Welfare, Maternal and Child Health, Education,
Juvenile Justice, and Substance Abuse.
Data were collected and analyzed by the Louisiana
Population Data Center. The portraits were prepared by Melissa O. Stainback with the
assistance of Brett Hebert.
Summary indexes of risk indicators were produced by
using two basic statistical techniques -- factor analysis and the calculation of z-scores.
Factor analysis is a procedure that groups multiple indicators into categories by
identifying similarities among them. A factor score for each of the risk items is
calculated to indicate the strength of its association with each of the categories. The
individual items that score highest within each category are weighted by these factor
scores and summed. This procedure reduced the risk indicators reported in this profile to
six identifiable categories as follows:
| Summary Category | Risk Indicators |
|---|---|
| Family Structure | Percent of female headed households with children under 5, 1990 Percent of female headed households with children under 18, 1990 |
| Poverty and Unemployment |
Percent children under 5 living in poverty, 1990 Percent children under 18 living in poverty, 1990 Median family income, 1990 Unemployment Rate, 1996 |
| Income Transfer Recipients |
Percent receiving aid to families with dependent children, 1996 Percent families with dependent children receiving food stamps, 1996 Percent families with dependent children receiving medicaid benefits Percent families with dependent children receiving social security benefits, 1995 |
| Educational Stability | Number of suspensions per 1000, 1994-95 Number of expulsions per 1000, 1994-95 Percent not registered in public schools, 1994-95 |
| Disruptive Events | Percent of births to teens, 1995 Children in custody / Under supervision (per 1000 children under 18), 1996 School dropouts (per 1000 children under 18), 1994-95 Infant mortality rates, 1991-1995 Proportion of youth in foster care, 1996 |
| Low Birthweight | Percent low birthweight, 1995 |
We then converted the summary category scores for each parish to z-scores, which are
standardized measures of deviation from the mean score of all parishes combined. The
z-scores reported in this publication represent the relative extent to which individual
parishes score above or below the mean score for the state, where negative scores are
below the state average and positive scores are above the state average. Because these are
standardized scores, comparisons can be made across parishes. Finally, we rank ordered the
z-scores by parish, where a ranking of 1 reflects the parish with the least risk and a
ranking of 64 reflects the parish with the highest risk, for that indicator.
| Parish | Rank Order (1=lowest risk; 64=highest risk) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Structure | Poverty and Unemployment |
Income Transfer | Educational Stability | Disruptive Events | Low Birthweight Newborns |
|
| Acadia | 28 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 26 | 47.5 |
| Allen | 29 | 41 | 19 | 42 | 42 | 41 |
| Ascension | 16 | 7 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 32.5 |
| Assumption | 30 | 36 | 33 | 34 | 11 | 52 |
| Avoyelles | 41 | 57 | 49 | 55 | 31 | 43 |
| Beauregard | 6 | 9 | 7 | 26 | 8 | 5.5 |
| Bienville | 39 | 56 | 55 | 61 | 15 | 62 |
| Bossier | 25 | 12 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 18 |
| Caddo | 58 | 32 | 41 | 19 | 43 | 50 |
| Calcasieu | 26 | 14 | 11 | 31 | 17 | 30 |
| Caldwell | 20 | 42 | 26 | 23 | 60 | 1 |
| Cameron | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 27.5 |
| Catahoula | 23 | 60 | 42 | 51 | 25 | 2 |
| Claiborne | 56 | 51 | 51 | 29 | 7 | 55.5 |
| Concordia | 54 | 46 | 54 | 53 | 45 | 45.5 |
| De Soto | 57 | 49 | 45 | 39 | 33 | 40 |
| East Baton Rouge | 42 | 13 | 24 | 44 | 18 | 50 |
| East Carroll | 64 | 64 | 64 | 7 | 62 | 25.5 |
| East Feliciana | 40 | 25 | 34 | 48 | 56 | 38 |
| Evangeline | 9 | 44 | 60 | 14 | 24 | 59 |
| Franklin | 37 | 54 | 48 | 21 | 58 | 34 |
| Grant | 18 | 29 | 28 | 45 | 55 | 3 |
| Iberia | 38 | 27 | 40 | 15 | 37 | 39 |
| Iberville | 49 | 37 | 53 | 32 | 36 | 36.5 |
| Jackson | 35 | 31 | 22 | 41 | 30 | 22.5 |
| Jefferson | 24 | 5 | 14 | 64 | 28 | 27.5 |
| Jefferson Davis | 10 | 21 | 15 | 16 | 19 | 17 |
| La Salle | 3 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 27 | 12 |
| Lafayette | 21 | 8 | 10 | 52 | 5 | 32.5 |
| Lafourche | 8 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 5.5 |
| Lincoln | 45 | 18 | 27 | 50 | 64 | 50 |
| Livingston | 4 | 3 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 22.5 |
| Madison | 62 | 62 | 61 | 49 | 59 | 43 |
| Morehouse | 55 | 58 | 52 | 3 | 63 | 16 |
| Natchitoches | 59 | 52 | 44 | 60 | 54 | 19.5 |
| Orleans | 63 | 50 | 63 | 25 | 61 | 60 |
| Ouachita | 51 | 33 | 38 | 38 | 44 | 30 |
| Plaquemines | 5 | 19 | 30 | 2 | 13 | 11 |
| Pointe Coupee | 27 | 39 | 43 | 58 | 9 | 53.5 |
| Rapides | 34 | 20 | 32 | 36 | 16 | 22.5 |
| Red River | 60 | 61 | 47 | 63 | 20 | 64 |
| Richland | 48 | 55 | 56 | 24 | 57 | 63 |
| Sabine | 31 | 40 | 20 | 12 | 49 | 7.5 |
| St. Bernard | 11 | 6 | 9 | 62 | 21 | 9.5 |
| St. Charles | 17 | 4 | 8 | 46 | 4 | 35 |
| St. Helena | 43 | 43 | 50 | 1 | 41 | 22.5 |
| St. James | 50 | 35 | 37 | 59 | 23 | 45.5 |
| St. John the Baptist | 19 | 11 | 25 | 43 | 1 | 58 |
| St. Landry | 46 | 53 | 59 | 22 | 40 | 53.5 |
| St. Martin | 22 | 23 | 21 | 13 | 51 | 47.5 |
| St. Mary | 32 | 30 | 36 | 47 | 34 | 14.5 |
| St. Tammany | 7 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 29 | 4 |
| Tensas | 61 | 63 | 62 | 57 | 53 | 7.5 |
| Terrebonne | 12 | 22 | 23 | 54 | 39 | 30 |
| Union | 13 | 24 | 12 | 8 | 22 | 36.5 |
| Vermilion | 15 | 26 | 18 | 20 | 10 | 13 |
| Vernon | 2 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 19.5 |
| Washington | 52 | 47 | 57 | 37 | 50 | 55.5 |
| Webster | 53 | 34 | 31 | 17 | 47 | 43 |
| West Baton Rouge | 36 | 16 | 29 | 56 | 38 | 14.5 |
| West Carroll | 14 | 59 | 35 | 5 | 46 | 25.5 |
| West Feliciana | 47 | 48 | 16 | 27 | 32 | 61 |
| Winn | 33 | 28 | 46 | 30 | 52 | 61 |